• 23 June 2008, 11:05:00 PM
i read about a big gossip online last night while watching Euro Quarter Finals: Spain vs Italy. it was a really boring match and i nearly fell asleep during the first half. Spain won the penalty in the end. then, my boy told me about this big juicy gossip he read about in a forum! (see http://tomorrow.sg/trackback/url/8618)
its about this 'molest' case which was on the papers last week. apparently it was the latest juicy gossip around and even my mom know about it but i was abit lag in this case.
well, i did some 'research' about the case and even went to her blog to read. but i still haven't manage to find a photo of her (not sure if this is the right jean: http://www.bmw-sg.com/forums/lounge/25899-photo-person-whom-received-s-48k-gift.html). no comments on the photo, just see for yourself.
her blog: http://jean.sg/2008/06/11/help-needed-i-was-molested-by-a-friend-while-i-was-asleep/
its about this 'molest' case which was on the papers last week. apparently it was the latest juicy gossip around and even my mom know about it but i was abit lag in this case.
well, i did some 'research' about the case and even went to her blog to read. but i still haven't manage to find a photo of her (not sure if this is the right jean: http://www.bmw-sg.com/forums/lounge/25899-photo-person-whom-received-s-48k-gift.html). no comments on the photo, just see for yourself.
her blog: http://jean.sg/2008/06/11/help-needed-i-was-molested-by-a-friend-while-i-was-asleep/
anyway, i don't understand why would she want to get a registered blog and pay for it when we can easily use the FREE and user-friendly blogspot, livejournal, etc.
after reading her blog and everything, i wouldn't side her at all. i really think she brought it upon herself whether she has any other motives or not.
- she knew that the guy likes her and has been after her for 2 years.
- she accepted $48k from the guy for a car/sch fees (not sure which) and said it was a gift from him since she did tell him that she might not be able to repay it. how naive is that?
- she went out with the guy frequently.
- she allowed the guy to hold her waist and shoulders unless there were friends around or something.
- she asked him to accompany her to Korea when all her girlfriends are not free. whatever happened to her parents and relatives?
- she allowed him to sleep on the same bed as her when the hotel made a mistake and gave them a double room instead of a twin room. haven't she heard of the crouch or an extra bed?
- she did not react when the guy first touched her back. obviously the guy would have thought otherwise.
she should be lucky that the guy did not force himself on her. it's just a touch afterall. it could have been worse. and she has this 'interesting' post titled Application for Boyfriend (see http://jean.sg/2008/05/18/application-for-boyfriend/). it looks as if she has 'ulterior motives' if i link it back to this case. anyway, its quite lame. i wonder if anyone has applied?
after reading her blog and everything, i wouldn't side her at all. i really think she brought it upon herself whether she has any other motives or not.
- she knew that the guy likes her and has been after her for 2 years.
- she accepted $48k from the guy for a car/sch fees (not sure which) and said it was a gift from him since she did tell him that she might not be able to repay it. how naive is that?
- she went out with the guy frequently.
- she allowed the guy to hold her waist and shoulders unless there were friends around or something.
- she asked him to accompany her to Korea when all her girlfriends are not free. whatever happened to her parents and relatives?
- she allowed him to sleep on the same bed as her when the hotel made a mistake and gave them a double room instead of a twin room. haven't she heard of the crouch or an extra bed?
- she did not react when the guy first touched her back. obviously the guy would have thought otherwise.
she should be lucky that the guy did not force himself on her. it's just a touch afterall. it could have been worse. and she has this 'interesting' post titled Application for Boyfriend (see http://jean.sg/2008/05/18/application-for-boyfriend/). it looks as if she has 'ulterior motives' if i link it back to this case. anyway, its quite lame. i wonder if anyone has applied?
a few funny links regarding this case:
this is a forum commenting about this case. quite vulgar but funny.
the latest posts are quite informative too (20th and 23rd june 2008).
are they the same jean?
